United States v. Valenzuela’s Empirical Analysis
521 F.2d 414 · 1975
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 1998 · most notably United States v. Agosto (1982), United States v. Lawriw (1977)
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 659
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Faretta v. California · Bruton v. United States · Lutwak v. United States · United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he “assistance of counsel” guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment contemplates that such assistance be untrammeled and unimpaired by a court order requiring that one lawyer shall simultaneously represent conflicting interests.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. United States v. Cox“[T]he “Assistance of Counsel” guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment contemplates that such assistance be untrammeled and unimpaired by a court order requiring that one lawyer simultaneously represent conflicting interests.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.