Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 F.2d 632 - Verbale HISCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

Verbale HISCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee’s Empirical Analysis

521 F.2d 632 · 1975

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
August 2005
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently August 2005 · most notably Bonham v. Dresser Industries, Inc. (1977), Anne M. DARTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee (1976)

33 federal appellate · 8 district ·

4901975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cruz v. Hauck · Parham v. Cortese · Johnson v. United States · Cox v. United States Gypsum Co. · United States v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 38

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(d) No civil action may be commenced by any individual under this section until the individual has given the Secretary not less than sixty days’ notice of an intent to file such action. Such notice shall be filed—”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) within one hundred and eighty days after the alleged unlawful practice occurred, or”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Every employer, employment agency, and labor organization shall post and keep posted in conspicuous places upon its premises a notice to be prepared or approved by the Secretary setting forth information as the Secretary deems appropriate to effectuate the purposes of this chapter.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.