In the Matter of Monte J. Morris, Esq. United States of America v. David Lee Alexander

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Aug. 8, 1975.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1975-08-08

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1975

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Johnson v. United States · Lefkowitz v. Newsome · Mann v. Smith

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1975-08-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1

Monte J. Morris (argued), Henderson, Nev., for defendant-appellant.

¶2

Daniel Henry, Asst. U. S. Atty. (appeared), Las Vegas, Nev., for plaintiff-appellee.

ORDER

¶3

Before CHAMBERS and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and VON DER HEYDT,* District Judge.

¶4

After a hearing Monte J. Morris, counsel of record for appellant, is assessed a penalty of three hundred dollars, under Rule 46(c), F.R.A.P., for failure to prosecute this criminal appeal with due diligence.

¶5

Payment is to be made to the Clerk of this Court within 14 days from the date of the filing of this order. The payment, in due course, will be transmitted to the Treasurer of the United States.

The Honorable James A. von der Heydt, United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation