Dr. Helen Bruce v. R. Elliott Scearce

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Sept. 10, 1975. Decided Sept. 16, 1975.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1975-09-16

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1977

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on 390 F. Supp. 297 - Bruce v. Scearce

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1975-09-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Eugene K. Buckley, St. Louis, Mo., for appellants.

Eugene P. Walsh, Clayton, Mo., for appellees.

Before HEANEY and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, Senior District Judge.*

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Upon a careful consideration of the record and of the briefs and arguments of the parties, the Court has concluded that the judgment of the District Court in Bruce v. Scearce, 390 F.Supp. 297 (E.D.Mo.1975), is based on findings that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. For these reasons, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed on the basis of the trial court's opinion.

TALBOT SMITH, Senior District Judge, Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation