Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 F.2d 844 - Rochelle v. United States

Rochelle v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

521 F.2d 844 · 1975

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
August 2006
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2006 · most notably Marshall v. Gibson's Products, Inc. of Plano (1978), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1001975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 103

Relies on Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc. · New York County National Bank v. Massey · Lewis Trustee v. United States · Washburn v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think a subordinated claim can be used to set off a claim by the bankrupt estate against the creditor even though the subordinated claim could not itself share in the dividends.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.