Carlsen v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
521 F.3d 1371 · 2008
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 254 · 5 U.S.C. § 5542 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez · Lindow v. United States · Bobo IV v. United States · Doe v. United States · Doe v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the period that is normally regarded as the cut-off for de minimis overtime is 10 minutes”); Lindow v. United States, 738 F.2d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir.1984) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.