Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 F.3d 5 - United States v. Rogers

United States v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

521 F.3d 5 · 2008

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2023

7 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

70200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3584

Relies on Spinelli v. United States · United States v. Ross · United States v. Doherty · United States v. Upham · United States v. Bonner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ny container - 17 - situated within residential premises which are the subject of a validly-issued warrant may be searched if it is reasonable to believe that the container could conceal items of the kind portrayed in the warrant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “may exercise its discretion in accordance with subsection (d) to fashion a sentence of appropriate length and structure it to run in any appropriate manner to achieve a reasonable punishment for the instant offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In determining whether it is reasonable to search a particular container for an object, 'search warrants and affidavits should be considered in a commonsense manner, and hypertechnical readings should be avoided.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.