Mariasch v. Gillette Co.’s Empirical Analysis
521 F.3d 68 · 2008
Citation profile
5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2021
5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 421
Relies on Edgar v. Mite Corp. · Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co. · Harrison v. NetCentric Corp. · Beard v. Elster · Ingram v. Brink's, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Massachusetts applies the internal affairs doctrine, which 'recognizes that only one State should have the authority to regulate a corporation's internal affairs-matters peculiar to the relationships among or between the corporation and its current officers, directors, and shareholders-because otherwise a corporation could be faced with conflicting demands.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The state with authority over a corporation's internal affairs is the state of incorporation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[S]ummary judgment cannot be defeated by relying on improbable inferences, conclusory allegations, or rank speculation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.