Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 F.3d 680 - Doe v. Bredesen

Doe v. Bredesen’s Empirical Analysis

521 F.3d 680 · 2008

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Doe · E.B. v. Verniero · Arthur Cutshall v. Don Sundquist, Govenor of the State of Tennessee · Jon Femedeer v. Hl "Pete" Haun · Doe v. Bredesen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we have every reason to believe that the dimensions of the system, while not presently conspicuous, will only become smaller and less cumbersome as technology progresses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.