United States v. Samuels’s Empirical Analysis
521 F.3d 804 · 2008
Citation profile
26 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably United States v. Rollins (2008), United States v. Spells (2008)
26 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Rita v. United States · Sells v. United States · United States v. Canoy · United States v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must know or have reason to know that the individual is a felon at the time of the aiding and abetting.” Samuels, 521 F.3d at 812 (noting that the defendant did”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.