Jewett v. Anders’s Empirical Analysis
521 F.3d 818 · 2008
Citation profile
24 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably United States v. Bullock (2011), Estate of Escobedo v. Bender (2010)
24 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Terry v. Ohio · Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In conducting our review, we do not evaluate the weight of the evidence, judge the credibility of witnesses or determine the ultimate truth of the matter; rather, we determine whether there exists a genuine issue of triable fact. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242 , 249-50, 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). Summary judgment is proper if “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In reviewing a district court's denial of qualified immunity, we cannot make conclusions about which facts the parties ultimately might be able to establish at trial. Nor may we reconsider the district court's determination that certain genuine issues of fact exist.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.