United States v. Engler’s Empirical Analysis
521 F.3d 965 · 2008
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2024
9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Franks v. Delaware · United States v. Bell · Tucker v. Hardy · United States v. Beckman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to be entitled to a hearing under Franks the defendant must make a substantial preliminary showing of a false or reckless statement or omission and must also show that the alleged false statement or omission was necessary to the probable cause determination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[the defendant] provided no evidence to establish that law enforcement officers deliberately or recklessly omitted information in an attempt to mislead the issuing judicial officer”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.