United States v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 656 · 18 U.S.C. § 665 · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Pinkerton v. United States · United States v. Marion · United States v. Calandra · Hamling v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Duplicity is 'the joining in a single count of two or more distinct and separate offenses.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.