Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 F. Supp. 753 - Ross v. Saltmarsh

521 F. Supp. 753 - Ross v. Saltmarsh’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New York (1983), Henry v. Webermeier (1984)

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

2501981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1701 (§ 202 of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974) · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Washington v. Davis · Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc. · Maher v. Gagne · New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer · County of Los Angeles v. Chavez-Salido

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “allowable fees and expenses may not be reduced because appellants' attorney was employed or funded by a civil rights organization and/or tax exempt foundation or because the attorney does not exact a fee”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party ... a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.