Gosnell v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Richardson v. Perales · Califano v. Sanders · Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the opportunity to reopen final decisions on applications ... [is] afforded by the Secretary's regulations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“essentially an abuse of agency discretion claim,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.