Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 FSUPP2D 240 - Marshall v. Grant

Marshall v. Grant’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
July 2014
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Conley v. Gibson · District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “perjury, fraud and misrepresentations ... are the type of claims held by the Exxon Mobil Court to be independent from the state judgment because they allege fraud in the procurement of the judgment and not just that the state court issued an incorrect opinion” (citing Exxon Mobil, 544 U.S. at 293 , 125 S.Ct. 1517 ; MacPherson v. State Street Bank and Trust Co., 452 F.Supp.2d 133, 140 (E.D.N.Y.2006)). Other courts have gone the other way. See O’Donnell v. United States, No. 05 CV 713, 2007 WL 983311 , (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2007) (holding that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.