Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 NE2D 320 - Kindred v. State

Kindred v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2015

1 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

1501988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Cherek v. United States · Boyd v. North Carolina · Lock v. State · Averhart v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) A circuit or superior court judge: (2) may appoint a special prosecutor if: (A) a person files a verified petition requesting the appointment of a special prosecutor; and (B) the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the appointment is necessary to avoid an actual conflict of interest or there is probable cause to believe that the prosecutor has committed a crime;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Aschliman v. State
  2. “should be made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, so that the record will establish that 'he knows what he is doing and his choice is made with eyes open.!”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Leonard v. State
  3. “to allow prosecutors to be disqualified merely upon the unilateral action of defendants * * * would lead to absurd consequences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. McManus

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.