Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 N.E.2d 363 - Wilson v. State

Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2009

5 state decisions

20198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ashton v. Anderson · Easterday v. State · Staton v. State · Raymond v. State · Moore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(Appel-lee's Brief, p. 8) In Ashton v. Anderson (1972), 258 Ind. 51 , 279 N.E.2d 210 , our supreme court limited the convictions for which a witness may be impeached for credibility to those involving infamous crimes (treason, murder, rape, arson, burglary, robbery, kidnapping, forgery and willful and corrupt perjury) or crimes involving dishonesty or false statement. 2 See Wilson v. State (1988), Ind.App., 521 N.E.2d 363, 367 , reh. denied, trans. denied. However, a defendant may”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Deviate sexual conduct” means an act involving: (1) a sex organ of one person and the mouth or anus of another person; or (2) the penetration of the sex organ or anus of a person by an object.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “rulings of a successor judge will not be disturbed for failure to specifically find that the first judge [was] unavailable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.