Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 NW2D 102 - Fast Horse v. Leapley

Fast Horse v. Leapley’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Lockhart v. Fretwell · Kimmelman v. Morrison · Bullock v. United States · State v. McBride

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the proceeding would have been different.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is not our function to second guess the decisions of experienced trial attorneys regarding matters of trial tactics.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A difference of trial tactics does not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.