Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 NW2D 118 - St. Cloud v. Leapley

St. Cloud v. Leapley’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

1 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2025

1 district · 21 state decisions

1201994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 94 · 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 25 U.S.C. § 980 · 25 U.S.C. § 983B · 25 U.S.C. § 983E · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wainwright v. Sykes · Taylor v. Louisiana · Peters v. Kiff · Fussell v. Price

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Habeas corpus can be used only to review (1) whether the court had jurisdiction of the crime and the person of the defendant; (2) whether the sentence was authorized by law; and (3) in certain cases, whether an incarcerated defendant has been deprived of basic constitutional rights. For purposes of habeas corpus, constitutional violations in a criminal case deprive the trial court of jurisdiction.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “state courts ... possess the authority, absent a provision for exclusive federal jurisdiction, to render binding judicial decisions that rest on their own interpretations of federal law. (Citations omitted). Indeed, inferior federal courts are not required to exist under Article III, and the Supremacy Clause explicitly states that "the Judges in every State shall be bound" by federal law. U.S. Const., Art. VI, cl. 2.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It is the policy of the State of South Dakota that all litigants in the courts of this state entitled to trial by jury shall have the right to grand and petit juries selected at random from a fair cross-section of the community, district or county where the court convenes....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.