Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 NW2D 645 - Howie v. Pennington County

Howie v. Pennington County’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1997
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division · Florida Bar v. Carter · Oviatt v. Oviatt Dairy, Inc. · Day v. John Morrell & Co. · R & T Construction Co. v. Judge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Department held administrative hearings on March 3, 1992, and April 28, 1992, to determine whether Howie was entitled to permanent total disability benefits, whether a lump-sum payment of those benefits should be given, whether a Grandee model home spa should be awarded, and whether an addition to her house to enclose the spa should be allowed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.