Eid v. Hodson’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schumacher v. Ihrke · Stacy v. Goff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not clear whether the trial court in the original action brought by the Eids intended to make the Hodsons and Scandy jointly liable for the entire amount of damages. It is clear, however, that the judgments actually entered did not establish joint liability for the entire amount.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Eid v. Hodson“Eids 15% Hodsons 50% Scandy 35% Edina 0%”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Eid v. Hodson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.