Bryant v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 1979
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 72 Okla. Crim. 195 - Nemecek v. State · Kupiec v. State · Walters v. State · Swarb v. State · 95 Okla. Crim. 311 - Rutherford v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ . . .if the defendant is not satisfied with the instructions given by the court, and desires additional or other instructions, it is his duty to prepare the desired instructions in writing and submit them to the court. If he fails to do so, a conviction will not be reversed unless the Court is of the opinion, in light of the entire record and instructions of the court, that there was a failure to instruct upon some material question of law, and that defendant has been deprived of a substantial right. . . . ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Schneider v. State · Rouse v. State““The only evidence defendant offers to support this claim is that the record reveals no admonition. Neither the defendant nor the record show that the jury acted improperly at any time, or that the lack of admonition resulted in any prejudicial injury. Therefore, we do not find that defendant was denied a fair and impartial trial.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kelsey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.