Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 P2D 793 - Carter v. Wooley

Carter v. Wooley’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
September 2003
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2003

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

501974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Washington Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Hammett · Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Associates Transports, Inc. · Cary v. Phoenix Ins. Co. · Pontiac Mutual County Fire & Lightning Insurance v. Sheibley · Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Butler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “under the circumstances, taking into consideration, among other things, the sum recovered for [State Farm], the difference between the fee [State Farm] is obligated to pay [its own attorney] and the amount it would have been obligated to pay him, or other competent counsel, if his efforts had been solely responsible for the settlement”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “in the effectuation of the settlement here involved, a distinct service was rendered [to the insurance company], that it could not otherwise have obtained without presumably paying some attorney (other than [Mr. Carter's] for that service.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “intended to say was that [Mr. Carter's attorney] did not perform any service ... he would not otherwise have performed for [Mr. Carter], then the findings upon which his judgment was apparently based were not sufficient to support it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.