State v. Frantz’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Both intent and premeditation may be inferred from circumstantial evidence. Juries presume a person intends all the natural consequences of his or her acts.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. State v. Mendez

2. “(S)tate and federal rulemakers have broad latitude under the Constitution to establish rules excluding evidence from criminal trials.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 63 Kan. App. 2d 799 - State v. Waterman

3. “when it is such person's conscious objective or desire to engage in the conduct or cause the result.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. State v. Hinostroza