Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 So. 2d 1346 - Lovell v. State

521 So. 2d 1346 - Lovell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 1999
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Dionisio · Counselman v. Hitchcock · Hopper v. Evans · Fulghum v. State · Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'In Robinson v. State , 441 So.2d 1045 , 1047 (Ala.Crim.App. 1983), this court observed that a person who intentionally draws a gun in response to or in anticipation of a confrontation with another is certainly aware of the risk that the gun might discharge; therefore, he cannot be guilty of mere criminal negligence.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““A person acts with criminal negligence with respect to a result or to a circumstance which is defined by statute as an offense when he fails to perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the result will occur or that the circumstance exists.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “" ' " '[D]ue process requires that a lesser included offense instruction be given only when the evidence warrants such an instruction.' Hopper v. Evans , 456 U.S. 605 , 102 S.Ct. 2049 , 72 L.Ed.2d 367 (1982). 'Under Alabama law, the rule in non-capital cases is that a lesser included offense instruction should be given if "there is any reasonable theory from the evidence which would support the position." ' Hopper , citing Fulghum [ v. State , 291 Ala. 71 , 277 So.2d 886 (1973).] By statute, '[t]he court shall not charge the jury with respect to an included offense unless there is a rational basis for a verdict convicting the defendant of the included offense.' Alabama Code Section 13A-1-9 (b) (1975)." ' " Woods v. State , 485 So.2d 1243 , 1245 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), quoting Phelps v. State , supra." Lovell v. State , 521 So.2d 1346 , 1350-51 (Ala.Crim.App. 1987).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.