¶1Affirmed. Piver v. Hoberman, 220 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); see Edward L. Nezelek, Inc. v. Sunbeam Television Corp., 413 So.2d 51 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 424 So.2d 763 (Fla.1982).
521 So. 2d 322
Laks v. Longo
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 8, 1988
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-03-08
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1997
1 state decisions
Relies on 424 So. 2d 758 - Hicks v. State · 413 So. 2d 51 - Edward L. Nezelek, Inc. v. Sunbeam Tel. Corp. · Piver v. Hoberman
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1988-03-08
View the full empirical analysis of this case →