521 So. 2d 85 - Ex Parte Cade’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2013
1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 396 So. 2d 645 - Beck v. State · Burroughs v. Georgia · Butler v. Olshan · 439 So. 2d 829 - Hamm v. State · 375 So. 2d 828 - Cade v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]ince [Murry] was guaranteed a new trial, he is also guaranteed a new appeal that would be based solely on the facts and evidence presented in his second trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"As our Supreme Court observed in Butler v. Olshan , 280 Ala. 181 , 188 , 191 So.2d 7 , [14] (1966), an appellate court may take judicial notice of its own records in another proceeding if the following three conditions are met: "First, the pleading in the instant case must refer to the other proceeding; second, the other proceeding must be of record in the trial court whose decree or judgment is the basis of the instant appeal; and third, the prior proceeding must be of record in the [appellate] court in another appeal *Page 217 [there] or be set out in the instant record." Hamm v. State , 439 So.2d 829 , 831 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983). See also Ex parte Cade , 521 So.2d 85 (Ala. 1987).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ex Parte Salter“the Court of Criminal Appeals resolved the issue raised by Cade from the evidence as presented in his second trial,” id. at 88 . No Alabama court has summarized the evidence at the second trial. We therefore undertake to distill the facts directly from the 1982 trial transcript with an eye only toward providing a sense of the background for Cade's petition. 2 . Four volumes of documents from Cade's trial, direct appeal, and state collateral attack were appended as exhibits to his federal habe-as corpus checklist. For convenience, this document collection will be abbreviated”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cade v. Haley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.