Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 SO2D 878 - Choctaw, Inc. v. Wichner

Choctaw, Inc. v. Wichner’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 2007

3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

80198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nelson v. Busby · Palmer v. Clarksdale Hospital · McCluskey v. Thompson · Maidman v. Stagg · McCorkle v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]ur neighbor Arkansas ... reasoned that the husband's right to such damages for loss of consortium was derivative, and that it was only logical that since the husband's cause of action was derivative he could have no better standing in court than his wife had.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Of course, the burden is on the [spouse in the consortium action] to prove that the alleged tort-feasor is guilty of negligence which directly contributed to [his or her] loss and damage, and the contributory negligence of [his or her injured] spouse would be a defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he construction that we have placed on the ... statute has in effect been approved by the legislature.... [A] decision of this Court interpreting the statutes becomes in effect a part of the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.