521 So. 2d 890 - Wash v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2000
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Stovall v. Denno · Manson v. Brathwaite · Santoni v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Opportunity of the witness to view the accused at the time of the crime; (2) The degree of attention exhibited by the witness; (3) The accuracy of the witness's prior description of the criminal; (4) The level of certainty exhibited by the witness at the confrontation; (5) The length of time between the crime and the confrontation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“... unless from the totality of the circumstances the identification was so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In that case, the jurors were permitted to take notes and the trial judge and defense attorneys agreed upon a jury instruction which informed the jurors that the notes were to be used only by the juror who took them to aid his/her own memory.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.