Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 So. 2d 898 - McKinney v. State

521 So. 2d 898 - McKinney v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2012

11 state decisions

601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. State · 484 So. 2d 339 - Wiley v. State · Bond v. State · 512 So. 2d 666 - Williams v. State · 493 So. 2d 1280 - Weeks v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled in this State that a conviction of rape may be upheld with the uncorroborated testimony of the victim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Six months of silence intervened between the publicity and the trial. The publicity here did not approach the level of publicity present in Wiley v. State, 484 So.2d 339 (Miss. 1986), where this Court affirmed a denial of motion to change venue. The level of publicity certainly did not approach that in Johnson v. State, 476 So.2d 1195, 1211 (Miss. 1985). Of the six factors indicating that venue should be changed, only one is present in this case. Weeks v. State, 493 So.2d 1280, 1286 (Miss. 1986). The trial court's refusal to grant a change of venue was not an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.