Banks v. Corte’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 456 So. 2d 249 - Ross v. Luton · 465 So. 2d 350 - Matter of Sheffield · 378 So. 2d 1115 - Reach v. Reach · Hundley v. Harrison · Barber v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(1) A judge should disqualify himself in a proceeding in which his disqualification is required by law or his impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances where: "(a) He has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding; "(b) He served as a lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom he previously practiced law served during such association as a lawyer in the matter, or the judge or such lawyer has been a material witness concerning it."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Adkins v. State“A mere accusation of bias, unsupported by substantial fact, does not require disqualification of a judge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.