Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 SW2D 495 - State v. Mills

State v. Mills’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
April 1992
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 1992

18 state decisions

100197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Phelps · State v. Maxwell · State v. Davis · State v. Nimrod

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Admission of objectionable hearsay evidence will not constitute reversible error if, as a matter of law, it can be concluded that such hearsay is merely cumulative to other evidence fully proving the issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.