Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 SW2D 703 - Taggart v. Crews

Taggart v. Crews’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
July 1994
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 1994

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

40197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gibbs v. General Motors Corporation · Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co. · Farley v. Prudential Insurance Company · Simmons & Simmons Construction Co. v. W. L. Rea D.B.A. W. L. Rea Construction Co. · Adams v. Abbott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A memorandum is required by the statute of frauds, not for the purpose of obtaining a contract in writing, but merely to furnish written evidence, signed by the party to be charged, of the obligation to be enforced against him. Therefore, a valid memorandum of the contract may consist of letters and telegrams signed by the party to be charged and addressed to his agent or the other party to the contract, or even to a third person not connected with the transaction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Whether a third-party is a third-party beneficiary depends on the intention of the parties as expressed in the language used in the instrument itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.