Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 SW2D 709 - Doss v. Doss

Doss v. Doss’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2002

11 state decisions

401975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gulley v. Gulley · Francis v. Francis · Deramus v. Thornton · Cooper v. Cooper · Ex Parte Cardwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We are not to be understood as saying, however, that there may not arise conditions involved in contempt matters where the writ of habeas corpus would not be adequate and where mandamus would be the proper remedy.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.