Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 SW2D 752 - Bell v. Sykes

Bell v. Sykes’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1984
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cochran v. Wool Growers Central Storage Co. · Ex Parte Gonzales · Kominczak v. Kominczak

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Section 14.07, supra, provides that: “(a) The best interest of the child shall always be the primary consideration of the court in determining questions of support of and access to the child . “(b) In determining the best interests of the child, the court shall consider the circumstances of the parents . . . ” Section 14.08, supra, provides: “(a) The motion shall allege that the circumstances of the child have materially and substantially changed since the entry of the order sought to be modified “(c) After a hearing and on a finding that the circumstances of the child have materially and substantially changed and that modification is in the best interest of the child, any order or part of an order may be modified, except that an order providing for support of a child may be modified only as to obligations accruing subsequent to the motion to modify.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.