Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 522 F.2d 206 - Casey v. United States

Casey v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

522 F.2d 206 · 1975

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
August 1981
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on N.L.R.B. v. A. Brandt Company, Inc · United States v. Jacquillon · Nelson v. United States · Ledet v. United States · United States v. Dunahoo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The motion for a new trial is no more than an effort to impeach the testimony of [the witness], and newly discovered impeachment evidence is not sufficient to justify a new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.