Tunder v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
522 F.2d 913 · 1975
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2012
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2671 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679 · 39 U.S.C. § 101 (Air Carriage of International Mail Act) · 39 U.S.C. § 5005
Relies on Cree v. Goldstein · White v. Bloomberg · Kennedy Electric Co. v. United States Postal Service · Fisher v. United States · Thomas v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We subscribe to the result and rationale of those cases and conclude that on the record before it, the trial court did not err in entering summary judgment for the United States.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Norton v. Murphy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.