Maes v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
522 F.3d 1093 · 2008
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on 16558a Hamilton v. Secretary of Health & Human Services of United States · Hawkins v. Chater · Henrie v. United States Department of Health & Human Services · Sorenson v. Bowen · Shannon v. Chater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The standard of review in a social security appeal is whether the correct legal standards were applied and whether the decision is supported by substantial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.