Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 522 F.3d 1148 - Booth v. Carnival Corp.

Booth v. Carnival Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

522 F.3d 1148 · 2008

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2023

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

120200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 45 U.S.C. § 51 (Federal Employers' Liability Act)

Relies on Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · Burnett v. New York Central Railroad · Kornberg v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. · Justice v. United States · Cabello v. Fernández-Larios

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Eleventh Circuit in Booth held that, under nearly identical circumstances to the instant case, equitable tolling was appropriate: Booth initially timely filed suit in a state court of competent jurisdiction. Despite the state courts’ eventual ruling that venue was improper, which ruling resulted in dismissal, Booth in no way slept on his claims against Carnival. Even though Booth filed the instant federal suit after the contractual limitation period had run, Carnival was aware within the limitation period that Booth was actively pursuing his cause of action. The underlying policy of repose, reflected in the agreed-upon limitation period, and designed to assure fairness to Carnival, is not violated by equitable tolling in this case. To the contrary, the interests of justice are best served here ... by allowing the parties to resolve Booth’s claims on the merits. Id. at 1152.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.