Ponder v. Pfizer, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Conley v. Gibson · Rl v. Ct · Fernandez-Montes v. Allied Pilots Ass'n · 567 So. 2d 1081 - Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“fear and apprehension of fraud, loss of money, and identity theft; the burden and cost of credit monitoring; the burden and cost of closing compromised credit accounts and opening new accounts; the burden of scrutinizing credit card statements and other statements for unauthorized transactions; damage to their credit; loss of privacy and other economic damages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the names, social security numbers, and in some instances, addresses and bonus information of Pfizer employees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“expenditure of time and money” in “monitoring their credit” does not constitute injury or damages because it”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.