State v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2013
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · Shapiro v. Thompson · Boddie v. Connecticut · Dunn v. Blumstein · Loving v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All durational residency requirements inherently infringe upon the fundamental constitutional right of interstate travel. Hence, all such requirements are prima facie invalid and will be countenanced only when they serve a compelling state interest.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Isakson v. Rickey“may be searching for a new equal protection analysis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Isakson v. Rickey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.