Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2014
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Spears · State v. Tobin · State v. Hambrick · Coleman v. Alexander · Mares v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘ * * * [I]f the offenses charged are separate and distinct either with respect to statutory definition, or, because * * * they grow out of different transactions and different evidence is needed to prove each, then the constitutional inhibition against double jeopardy is not applicable and, so long as the offenses charged are not factually inconsistent, a defendant may be found guilty and judgment of sentence thereon may be had as to each of the offenses charged.’ ” Jackson v. State, 522 P.2d 1356, 1359 (Wyo. 1974), cert. den. 419 U.S. 1055 , 95 S.Ct. 637 , 42 L.Ed.2d 652 (1974), quoting State v. Johnson, 112 Ohio App. 124 , 165 N.E.2d 814, 820 (1960).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Duffy v. State · Jerskey v. State““. . . Even so, as pointed out by this court in State v. Tobin, 31 Wyo. 355 , 226 P. 681, 686 , in certain situations the violation of a charged offense separate and distinct from another with respect to statutory definition is necessarily embraced in and merged in the other.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jerskey v. State““separate and distinct with respect to statutory definition.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jerskey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.