¶1We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief because the motion makes no attempt to comply with the time requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850; nor does it contain an explanation justifying the untimely filing as required by the rule.
522 So. 2d 1043
522 So.2d 1043
13 Fla.L.Weekly 882
Golphin v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 6, 1988
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-04-06
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1990
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1988-04-06
View the full empirical analysis of this case →