Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 522 SO2D 1119 - State v. Pounds

State v. Pounds’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1995
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · 376 So. 2d 1240 - State v. Gainey · 312 So. 2d 282 - State v. Rembert · State v. Patterson · 457 So. 2d 1264 - State v. Banks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was stolen and for failing to specify dates on which the theft and the illegal receipt occurred. As previously discussed, the indictment sufficiently identified the conduct charged and the statute violated. The indictment specifies the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.