Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 522 SO2D 1344 - Kaplan v. Kaplan

Kaplan v. Kaplan’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2007

14 state decisions

80198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boswell v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc. · Abunza v. Olivier · 492 So. 2d 902 - Queenan v. Queenan · Queenan v. Queenan · Hall v. Hall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(4) The court shall then partition the community in accordance with the following rules: (a) The court shall value the assets as of the time of trial on the merits, determine the liabilities, and adjudicate the claims of the parties. (b) The court shall divide the community assets and liabilities so that each spouse receives property of an equal net value. (c) The court shall allocate or assign to the respective spouses all of the community assets and liabilities. In allocating assets and liabilities, the court may divide a particular asset or liability equally or unequally or may allocate it in its entirety to one of the spouses. The court shall consider the nature and source of the asset or liability, the economic condition of each spouse, and any other circumstances that the court deems relevant. As between the spouses, the allocation of a liability to a spouse obligates that spouse to extinguish that liability. The allocation in no way affects the rights of creditors. In the event that the allocation of assets and liabilities results in an unequal net distribution, the court shall order the payment of an equalizing sum of money, either cash or deferred, secured or unsecured, upon such terms and conditions as the court shall direct. The court may order the execution of notes, mortgages, or other documents as it deems necessary, or may impose a mortgage or lien on either community or separate property, movable or immovable, as security.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... much needed latitude to arrive at an equitable distribution of assets and liabilities between the spouses....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a spouse must show that the funds were actually used to benefit the community.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.