522 So. 2d 3 - McKissick v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “'Furnish' means to supply by any means, by sale or otherwise, and a sale need not be shown.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Mathis v. State · Owes v. State

2. “did sell, furnish or give away Marijuana.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Owes v. State · 545 So. 2d 200 - Kinsey v. State

3. “"The court in Hill , the case upon which appellant relies, recognizes the difference in result between those cases in which the defendant was charged with a 'sale' in the ordinary sense of the word and those in which the accused was charged with some other action, such as 'delivering,' 'distributing,' or 'furnishing.' 348 So.2d at 853-55. In the latter type *Page 202 of prosecution, the issue of agency is irrelevant and the 'procuring agent' defense is precluded. State v. Sharp , 104 Idaho 691 , 662 P.2d 1135 (1983); Harwood v. State , 543 P.2d 761 (Okla.Cr.App. 1975); Tipton v. State , 528 P.2d 1115 (Okla.Cr.App. 1974)." 522 So.2d at 4.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 545 So. 2d 200 - Kinsey v. State