522 So. 2d 709 - Jackson v. Case’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1994
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp. · Oller v. Sharp Electric, Inc. · 427 So. 2d 1312 - Watson v. Cook · Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp. · 518 So. 2d 1077 - Toups v. Hawkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"That portion of an affidavit or deposition not based on personal knowledge should not be considered in deciding a motion for summary judgment. Statements in affidavits or depositions of the opinion or belief of an expert based on his special training and experience do not meet the requirement of personal knowledge. A statement of opinion is not sufficiently certain or probative to justify a conclusion that there is no issue of fact which should be determined by a trial on the merits. Expert opinion statements or testimony requires evaluation by the trier of fact as to probative value. A motion for summary judgment is not the proper vehicle for the trier of fact to evaluate evidence and determine the facts which are disputed."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.