Nathan v. Home Depot’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1996
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Arceneaux v. Domingue · Canter v. Koehring Company · Nailor v. International Harvester Co. · Harris v. State Through Huey P. Long Mem. Hosp. · 351 So. 2d 821 - St. Pierre v. Gabel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“.... Where the testimony of expert witnesses differs, it is largely a matter of fact for the jury to determine the most credible evidence, and a finding of fact in this regard will not be overturned unless manifest error appears in the record. Nathan at 715.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.