Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 522 So. 2d 756 - Byrd v. State

522 So. 2d 756 - Byrd v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 2018

23 state decisions

1201988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 514 So. 2d 295 - Faraga v. State · 484 So. 2d 1002 - Gates v. State · 517 So. 2d 1373 - Wiley v. State · Fairley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here a defendant retains new counsel at the eleventh hour, he is not entitled to a continuance merely because new counsel was unprepared.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he jury is the sole judge of the weight and credibility of the evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A convicted defendant's claims that counsel's assistance was so defective as to require reversal of a conviction or death sentence has two components. First, the defendant must show that counsel's performance was deficient. This requires showing that counsel made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the `counsel' guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment. Second, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. This requires showing that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, the trial whose result is reliable. Unless a defendant makes both showings, it cannot be said the conviction or death sentence resulted from a breakdown in the adversary process that renders the result unreliable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.